Morpheus on… Infinity – Plus One

I’ve always LOVED that concept! And while I’m sure I’m not the first to dream it up, it was new to ME on a certain day, back around 1967.

I was about fourteen, in the “A” stream at Copleston High, when a temporary teacher decided to wind us all up – by presenting us with an unsolvable problem.

The premise was as follows: if you take two objects and divide the distance between them by half – then move them that much closer to one another – then divide THAT distance by half – rinse and repeat – will they ever make CONTACT? Yes or no?

Of course, it’s like the chicken and the egg – which came first? Neither answer works.

And likewise, the two objects. If you constantly HALVE their distance apart, they can never meet. But if they continue to CLOSE on each other – they MUST.

Eventually, I said, “I’ve GOT it.”

Seventy-two eyes swung in my direction.

“You have given us a problem in three dimensions – to which, since those objects are constantly moving towards each other – the answer MUST be YES.

“However, to QUALIFY that answer we must bring in the FOURTH dimension; TIME.

“The question then becomes not IF the two objects will meet – but WHEN.

“And the answer to THAT question is… INFINITY… PLUS ONE!!”

…At which point, the discussion swung to the concept of infinity.

Even the grains of sand on our planet have now been quantified (roughly, of course).

The only thing now – and indeed, back then – that is infinite (well… probably) is the universe – closely followed by a Bangkok long-duration traffic light – but that I won’t trouble you with.

Instead, I’ll pose a question of my own: is infinity plus one… SMALLER than infinity plus TWO?!

Discuss.

Advertisements

2 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Cy Quick on July 26, 2015 at 7:13 pm

    I learned a long time ago that we can put words together that are good grammar but do not mean anything. The word infinity does does not stand for anything real. It is a word expressing a non-existent phenomenon.

    In addition, we are mixing two worlds in our discussion: the world of physics and the world of intellectual word play. There must come a time when, in the physical world far below the sub-particle level, it will not be possible to move the objects any closer together because they will already have come into contact on the molecular or particle level. And there is repulsion to contend with. It is nonsensical wordplay to propose impossible events.

  2. Posted by Vincent on July 30, 2015 at 6:37 pm

    You’re right of course; once the two objects reach (for all practical purposes) each other, the whole thing becomes a molecular, nay atomic MESS – as protons merge and so on. I did not mention this in the piece as it would have muddied the main thrust of it (which wasn’t that strong to begin with!)

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: